Arredondo-Meza v. USA
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 29, 2016
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 25 Motion to Strike. Movants claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at the plea stage alleged in Ground 4 of his § 2255 Motion 1 is GRANTED. The Government shall reoffer the Plea Agreement to Movant for his consideration within 10 days from the date of this Order, or the parties may stipulate that Movant will accept the plea offer within 10 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|October 28, 2014
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and dismissing in part 5 Motion to Dismiss. Grounds One, Two, and Three of the § 2255 Motion are DISMISSED and Ground Four is DISMISSED IN PART. Arredondo-Meza may proceed with his claim of pretri al ineffective assistance of counsel through appointed counsel. Because he will be represented by counsel, he shall refrain from filing any pro se motions. The Clerk of Court shall take the necessary steps to obtain counsel from the CJA appointment l ist to represent Movant in this proceeding. Appointed counsel shall review the record, consult with Arredondo-Meza, confer with Government counsel, and submit a joint status report as described above within 60 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?