Asset Vision, LLC et al v. Fielding et al
| Asset Vision LLC and Deer Valley Trucking, Inc. |
| Creg Fielding, Brad H Hall, Cole Hall and Brad Hall and Associates |
| 4:2013cv00288 |
| July 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bonneville - Eastern |
| Ronald E. Bush |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 504 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Brad Hall & Associates, Inc.'s (BH&A) Motion for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Brad Hall & associates, Inc. 109 DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs 88 is GRANTED. BH&As is granted $1,778.53 for court and litigation expenses and attorney fees in the amount of $84,375.50. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 46 Sealed Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Terry J Hatter, Jr. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (Hatter, Terry)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Granting 66 MOTION to Expedite and to Shorten Time filed by Asset Vision LLC, Deer Valley Trucking, Inc., and Granting 65 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 46 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Asset Vision LLC, Deer Valley Trucking, Inc. Plaintiff's reply brief to its motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed by January 28, 2014. Signed by Judge Terry J Hatter, Jr. ((Hatter, Terry)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Brad Hall & Associates, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 27 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint on or before 12/31/2013. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations 42 is GRANTED in part as explained above. Plaintiffs' Motion to Shorten Time 43 is DEEMED MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
38
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Plan to be filed by 1/31/2014. Amended Pleadings due by 2/28/2014. Completion of Discovery due by 6/30/2014. Joinder of Parties due by 2/28/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 7/31/2014. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that unless all parties file awritten agreement on or before 10/22/2013 that the Court need not recuse itselfpursuant to Canons 3(C)(1) & (D), the Court will recuse itself and direct the Clerk to reassign this case to another Judge. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
