Hopkins v. Nakamoto et al
||R Sam Hopkins
||Darryl Nakamoto, Jeremy Xiaoming Yin, Jerrod Shreck, Scott Paul, Tao Zhang, Dean Hirata, Karl Stahikopf, Yi Zheng, Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co.,Ltd. and Jane & John Does 1-10
||October 5, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Idaho
||Pocatello - Eastern Office
||Bannock - Eastern
||B. Lynn Winmill
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 30, 2017
ORDER OF DISMISSAL It is ORDERED that the above-captioned adversary proceeding is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|November 18, 2015
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Withdraw Reference; granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion to Withdraw Reference. The ban kruptcy court will preside over all pretrial matters in this proceeding, including discovery and pretrial conferences, and will resolve routine and dispositive motions. Until the bankruptcy court certifies that the claims asserted against the individ uals are ready for trial, the parties shall file all motions, pleadings, and other papers in the adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)(Emailed to JDP, dj, dh & lg at Bankruptcy Court.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?