Andersen Manufacturing Inc. v. Wyers Products Group, Inc.
| Andersen Manufacturing Inc. |
| Wyers Products Group, Inc. |
| 4:2016cv00051 |
| January 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bonneville - Eastern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the following definitions shall govern this litigation: (1) Hitch Adapter: A device mounted to a towing vehicle and configured to receive a hitch. (2) A hitch component that conn ects a hitch adapter to a trailer where the hitch adapter and the part of the trailer that receives the hitch are at different heights. The motion for leave to submit a supplemental brief (docket no. 57 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Motions terminated: 57 MOTION for Leave to File Markman Supplement filed by Wyers Products Group, Inc.. (km)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the three Motions to supplement (docket nos. 41, 45 & 52) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Motion to Stay (docket no. 28) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. Motions term inated: 52 MOTION for Leave to File Supplement filed by Wyers Products Group, Inc., 41 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Opposition filed by Andersen Manufacturing Inc., 28 MOTION to Stay filed by Wyers Products Group, Inc., and 45 MOTION to Supplement Defendant's Motion to Stay filed by Wyers Products Group, Inc.. (km)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 38 Stipulation. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER approving 32 Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to the Motion to Stay shall be extended from 6/24/2016 to 6/27/2016. Additionally, the deadline for the parties to exchange proposed claim constructions and extrinsic evidence shall be extended from 7/6/2016 to 7/15/2016. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andersen Manufacturing Inc. v. Wyers Products Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andersen Manufacturing Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael K Friedland |
| Represented By: | Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen |
| Represented By: | Jon A Stenquist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wyers Products Group, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
