Collis v. Tomlinson and Associates and its owners et al
| Colt Esmond Collis |
| Tomlinson and Associates and its owners and Owners of Poplar Grove Apartments |
| 4:2016cv00524 |
| December 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Cassia - Eastern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Motion to Review Amended Complaint (Dkt. 16 ) is GRANTED. The Court has reviewed Colliss Amended Complaint; however, Collis has not remedied the previously identified deficiencies and his Amended Complaint is, therefore, subject to summary dismissal. 2. Plaintiffs Amended Motion to Review (Dkt. 18 ) and Motion and Requests for Clarifications (Dkt. 20 ) are DISMISSED as moot.3. Plaintiffs Motion to Allow Tort Notice, Motion that Judg e Nye Read this, things Judge Dale missed etc. (Dkt. 22 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED inPART. The Motion is granted to the extent that Judge Nye did read and revieweverything in this case. The Motion is denied and dismissed in all other respects. 4. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
