Arizona Lithium Company Ltd. v. Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arizona Lithium Company Ltd.
Defendant: Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Arizona Lithium Company Ltd.
Case Number: 4:2017cv00351
Filed: August 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Pocatello - Eastern Office
County: Lemhi - Eastern
Presiding Judge: David C. Nye
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER re 59 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony not Previously Disclosed and Evidence Created by Plaintiffs after Close of Discovery filed by North American Cobalt Inc, 45 MOTION for Summary J udgment filed by North American Cobalt Inc, and 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) filed by International Cobalt Corp, Arizona Lithium Company Ltd., Idaho Metals Corp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: NAC's Motion for Summa ry Judgment (Dkt. 45 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. NAC's Motion (Dkt. 45 ) is further GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of BOCO Claims 3-8. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Arizona Lithium's Motion for Part ial Summary (Dkt. 50 ) is DENIED. NAC's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 59 ) is dismissed as moot. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, the parties shall submit their unavailable trial dates starting in January, 2020, and also state how many days they believe it will take to try this matter. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant Battery Minerals Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Idaho Code section 47-611 (Dkt. 12 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arizona Lithium Company Ltd. v. Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Represented By: Albert P Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arizona Lithium Company Ltd.
Represented By: Anna E Courtney
Represented By: Richard R. Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Battery Mineral Resources, Inc.
Represented By: Albert P Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Arizona Lithium Company Ltd.
Represented By: Anna E Courtney
Represented By: Richard R. Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?