Kerr et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
| Terry Kerr and Dennis Kerr |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Perkinscoie LLP, Akerman LLP and Does 1-10 |
| 4:2018cv00146 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Bonneville - Eastern |
| David C. Nye |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 19 and 23 are GRANTED and the Kerrs' Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The Court HEREBY ORDERS: 1. The Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 3 ), is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. The Kerrs shall file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the issuance of this Order. Th e Complaint must contain sufficient factual details to give Defendants notice of the claims asserted and the basis for those claims. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)(Mailed to pro se Plaintiffs on 6/29/2018.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
