Tugaw Ranches, LLC v. U.S. Department of Interior et al
| Tugaw Ranches, LLC |
| U.S. Department of Interior, Ryan Zinke, Bureau of Land Management, Brian Steed, Sonny Perdue, U.S. Forest Service, Victoria Christiansen and U.S. Department of Agriculture |
| 1:2018cv00159 |
| April 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Pocatello - Eastern Office |
| Cassia - Eastern |
| Candy W. Dale |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 4208 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Defendants Motion to Lift Stay (Dkt. 54 ) is DENIED without prejudice. The parties joint status update is due on or before January 8, 2020, and should include the status of the Forest Services revisions, any actions taking by Congress, and whether an extension of the stay is warranted and why. The briefing on the Motion to Intervene is vacated until further notice. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 14 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David C. Nye. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
