Harrison v. Berryhill

Harrison v. Berryhill

Petitioner:	Bryan T Harrison
Respondent:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	4:2018cv00177
Filed:	April 20, 2018
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Pocatello - Eastern Office
County:	Bannock - Eastern
Presiding Judge:	Candy W. Dale
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2019	Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Petitioner is awarded costs of $400.00 and EAJA attorney fees in the amount of $8,240.00 pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010); Respondent shall issue a check for EAJA fees made payable to Petitioner's attorney, Brendon C. Taylor, and mailed to: Merrill & Merrill, P.O. Box 991, Pocatello, ID 83201. Any assignment to Petitioner's counsel of said fees will be subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and The motion is denied as to the requested fees for time spent prior to the filing of the petition for review and not in preparation for filing the federal suit. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (klw)
September 19, 2019	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) Plaintiffs Petition for Review (Dkt. 1 ) is GRANTED. 2) This action shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 3) This Remand shall be considered a sentence four remand, consistent with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002). Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (jd)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2019

Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Petitioner is awarded costs of $400.00 and EAJA attorney fees in the amount of $8,240.00 pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010); Respondent shall issue a check for EAJA fees made payable to Petitioner's attorney, Brendon C. Taylor, and mailed to: Merrill & Merrill, P.O. Box 991, Pocatello, ID 83201. Any assignment to Petitioner's counsel of said fees will be subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and The motion is denied as to the requested fees for time spent prior to the filing of the petition for review and not in preparation for filing the federal suit. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (klw)

September 19, 2019

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) Plaintiffs Petition for Review (Dkt. 1 ) is GRANTED. 2) This action shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 3) This Remand shall be considered a sentence four remand, consistent with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002). Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrison v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryan T Harrison
Represented By:	Kent L Hawkins
Represented By:	Brendon C. Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?