Carstensen et al v. United States of America
| Mary S. Carstensen, Duke Rohlen, Hans L Carstensen, III and Kendall Simpson Rohlen |
| United States of America |
| 4:2018cv00515 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| David C Nye |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Real Property: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER. This case is hereby stayed in accordance with General Order No. 339. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (km)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(jp) |
| DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE of Case Number Change, Case no longer assigned to Judge David. C. Nye. Case has been reassigned to Judge B. Lynn Winmill. The division has been changed from southern to eastern. Please use this case number on all future pleadings, 4:18-cv-515-BLW (jp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND TO QUIET TITLE (RS 2339) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1813775.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General of the United States, #2 Summons United States Forest Service, #3 Summons United States Attorneys Office, #4 Summons United States Attorney for the District of Idaho, #5 Cover Sheet)(Claiborne, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
