Scullin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Mark Scullin
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2019cv00209
Filed: June 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Ronald E Bush
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Filing 12 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jd)
July 26, 2019 Filing 11 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd)
July 19, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Mark Scullin, Union Pacific Railroad Company re #1 Complaint Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 9/17/2019. (alw)
June 24, 2019 Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER Approving #7 & #8 Applications for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorneys James K Vucinovich & Coby C.N. Cohen for Mark Scullin. Per General Order 206, out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
June 21, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by James K. Vucinovich. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0976-1903627.)Reed W Larsen appearing for Plaintiff Mark Scullin. Responses due by 7/12/2019 (Larsen, Reed)
June 21, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Coby C. N. Cohen. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0976-1903624.)Reed W Larsen appearing for Plaintiff Mark Scullin. Responses due by 7/12/2019 (Larsen, Reed)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER GRANTING Unopposed #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before August 16, 2019. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (dg)
June 18, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Timothy J Coleman appearing for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. Responses due by 7/9/2019 (Coleman, Timothy)
June 18, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Coleman, Timothy)
June 14, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Scullin. Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 6/13/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Larsen, Reed)
June 13, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd)
June 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Union Pacific Railroad Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1898874.), filed by Mark Scullin. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Larsen, Reed)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scullin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Timothy J Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Scullin
Represented By: Reed W Larsen
Represented By: James K Vucinovich
Represented By: Christopher N Coby Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?