Scullin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Mark Scullin |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
4:2019cv00209 |
June 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Ronald E Bush |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(jd) |
Filing 11 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (jd) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Mark Scullin, Union Pacific Railroad Company re #1 Complaint Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 9/17/2019. (alw) |
Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER Approving #7 & #8 Applications for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of attorneys James K Vucinovich & Coby C.N. Cohen for Mark Scullin. Per General Order 206, out-of-state counsel shall immediately register for ECF. (Notice sent to CM/ECF Registration Clerk) (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 8 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by James K. Vucinovich. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0976-1903627.)Reed W Larsen appearing for Plaintiff Mark Scullin. Responses due by 7/12/2019 (Larsen, Reed) |
Filing 7 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE APPEARANCE by Coby C. N. Cohen. ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0976-1903624.)Reed W Larsen appearing for Plaintiff Mark Scullin. Responses due by 7/12/2019 (Larsen, Reed) |
Filing 6 DOCKET ENTRY ORDER GRANTING Unopposed #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before August 16, 2019. Signed by Judge Ronald E. Bush. (dg) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Timothy J Coleman appearing for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. Responses due by 7/9/2019 (Coleman, Timothy) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Coleman, Timothy) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark Scullin. Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 6/13/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Larsen, Reed) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Union Pacific Railroad Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0976-1898874.), filed by Mark Scullin. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Larsen, Reed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scullin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Timothy J Coleman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Scullin | |
Represented By: | Reed W Larsen |
Represented By: | James K Vucinovich |
Represented By: | Christopher N Coby Cohen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.