Baumgartner v. Larsen et al
| Rodney R. Baumgartner |
| McCord Larsen and Matt Love |
| 4:2019cv00321 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT: Civil Filing Fee Fee Received $400.00, receipt #IDX25055 Paid in Full. (jld) |
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ckh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER of Conditional Filing. (ckh)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rodney R. Baumgartner. (Attachments: #1 Appellant's Brief, #2 State's Exhibit 1, #3 State's Exhibit 2, #4 Notes Submitted with Complaint, #5 Cover Letter from ID Supreme Court, #6 Second Page of Notes Submitted with Complaint) (ckh) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Prisoner Trust Fund Account. This is a sealed document. re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodney R. Baumgartner. (ckh) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Rodney R. Baumgartner. Responses due by 9/9/2019. (ckh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
