Lee, et al. v. Kim, et al.
Yong Ja Chung and Kang Ho Lee |
Kim Kyung-Min and Cho Kwang Kim |
4:2021cv00227 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
B Lynn Winmill |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (alw) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Yong Ja Chung and for Kang Ho Lee and counsel for Cho Kwang Kim and for Kim Kyung-Min, re #1 Complaint and #4 Answer to Complaint. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 8/31/2021. (jd) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cho Kwang Kim.(Crow, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kang Ho Lee, Yong Ja Chung. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Kim Kyung-Min)(Kluksdal, John) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(alw) |
Notice of Reassignment and Case Number Change: Case was opened with incorrect division. Corrected to Eastern Division and case reassigned to Judge B Lynn Winmill. Please use case number 4:21-cv-227-BLW for all future filings. (alw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2220560.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Kim, #2 Summons Kyung-Min, #3 Cover Sheet)(Kluksdal, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.