Monk et al v. United States of America
| Amber Monk and Jonathan Lowden |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 4:2021cv00419 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Candy W Dale |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2022 11:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Courtroom 6 before Judge Candy W. Dale. On or before January 20, 2022, the parties must file with the Court the jointLitigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (alw)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(alw)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet re Corrective Entry,. (Gamble, Donald)
|
|
CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #1 Complaint, filed by Jonathan Lowden, Amber Monk was filed incorrectly in this case. The filing party shall re-submit their cover sheet after it's been dated and signed.(alw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2293837.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Post Master, #2 Summons - US AG ID, #3 Summons - US AG, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gamble, Donald) Modified on 10/28/2021 to remove duplicate language (alw).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
