Stanley v. Jennings, et al.
| Sarah Stanley |
| Gary Lee Jennings, Laurie Baird Gaffney, Jeffery W. Banks, Daniela Jezova, Lettie Messick, Pegi Braunschweig, Marilee Packer, Jason D. Walker, Gabby Hermosillo, Jenny Robles, Kim Keeley, Susan Hill, Steve Bezdeka, Tracy Gorman, Barbara Thompson, Weston Davis, Chris Lundberg, Kathy Spitzer and Bailey Smith |
| 4:2021cv00464 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
DOCKET ENTRY ORDER: Having reviewed #29 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the pending motions to dismiss #8 , #14 , #16 , #21 , #22 , and [24}, and finding good cause, IT IS ORDERED that #29 Plaintiff's motion to extend the response deadlines to the pending motions to dismiss #8 , #14 , #16 , #21 , #22 , and [24} is GRANTED. The new deadlines are as follows: Responses due by 2/25/2022. Replies due by 3/11/2022. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jsv)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 , #14 , #16 , #21 , and #24 . Per docket 30 - Responses due by 2/25/2022. Replies due by 3/11/2022. (kt)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motions as to #24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Younger abstention doctrine, and absolute immunity, #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous , #22 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous by Plaintiff Sarah Stanley. Responses due by 2/14/2022 (kt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2022: #1 Envelope) (kt).
|
|
Filing 28
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Immediate Injunction and Stay on Visitation Orders (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to E-File (Dkt. #4 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion Hearing for Immediate Injunction and Cease and Desist (Dkt. #7 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff by U.S. mail. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (kt)
|
|
Filing 27
Docket entry only - CONSENT to Magistrate Judge filed. (kt)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement (kt)
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Chris Lundberg, Kathy Spitzer re #1 Complaint, #23 Notice of Appearance. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 3/7/2022. (kt)
|
|
Filing 24
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Christopher James Lundberg appearing for Defendants Chris Lundberg, Kathy Spitzer. Responses due by 1/26/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Lundberg, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher James Lundberg on behalf of Chris Lundberg, Kathy Spitzer (Lundberg, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 22
Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Laurie Baird Gaffney appearing for Defendants Jeffery W. Banks, Pegi Braunschweig, Laurie Baird Gaffney, Gary Lee Jennings, Daniela Jezova, Lettie Messick, Marilee Packer. Responses due by 1/26/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Gaffney, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ( Responses due by 1/26/2022)Laurie Baird Gaffney appearing for Defendants Jeffery W. Banks, Pegi Braunschweig, Laurie Baird Gaffney, Daniela Jezova, Lettie Messick, Marilee Packer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Gaffney, Laurie)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement re #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous (kt)
|
|
Filing 19
NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to Weston Davis re #15 Notice of Appearance. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 3/7/2022. (kt)
|
|
Filing 18
DECLARATION of Weston Davis re #17 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous filed by Weston Davis . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Davis, Weston)
|
|
Filing 17
MEMORANDUM in Support re #16 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous filed by Weston Davis.(Davis, Weston)
|
|
Filing 16
First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , First MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous ( Responses due by 1/25/2022)Weston Scott Davis appearing for Defendant Weston Davis. (Davis, Weston)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by Weston Scott Davis on behalf of Weston Davis (Davis, Weston)
|
|
Filing 14
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Bren Erik Mollerup appearing for Defendant Jason D. Walker. Responses due by 1/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo in support of motion to dismiss)(Mollerup, Bren)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Tracy Gorman, and Barbara Thompson re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 3/4/2022. (jd)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement re #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous (jd)
|
|
Filing 11
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous ( Responses due by 1/24/2022)Austin Orme Allen appearing for Defendants Tracy Gorman, Barbara Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions)(Allen, Austin)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Gabby Hermosillo, Susan Hill, Kim Keeley, Jenny Robles, Bailey Smith, and Sarah Stanley re #1 Complaint and #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Younger abstention doctrine, and absolute immunity Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 3/1/2022. (jd)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigants of the Summary Judgment Rule Requirement re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Younger abstention doctrine, and absolute immunity (jd)
|
|
Filing 8
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Younger abstention doctrine, and absolute immunity Blake G Hall appearing for Defendants Gabby Hermosillo, Susan Hill, Kim Keeley, Jenny Robles, Bailey Smith. Responses due by 1/20/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Hall, Blake)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Hearing by Plaintiff Sarah Stanley. Responses due by 1/18/2022 (jd)
|
|
Filing 6
DOCKET ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The Court notes that Plaintiff paid the filing fee on December 13, 2021, and Summons were issued. Plaintiff's #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is therefore DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jsv)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Bailey Smith, #2 Jason Walker, #3 Gabby Hermosillo, #4 Jenny Robles, #5 Kim Keeley, #6 Susan Hill, #7 Steve Bezdeka, #8 Tracy Gorman, #9 Barbara Thompson, #10 Weston Davis, #11 Kathy Spitzer, #12 Gary Jennings, #13 Laurie Gaffney, #14 Jeffrey Banks, #15 Daniela Jezova, #16 Lettie Messick, #17 Pegi Braunschweig, #18 Marilee Packer)(jd)
|
|
RECEIPT: Check Fee Received $ 402.00, receipt # 29009. (jd)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to E-File by Plaintiff Sarah Stanley. Responses due by 12/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support)(jd)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Immediate Injunction and Stay on all visitation orders by Plaintiff Sarah Stanley. Responses due by 12/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support)(jd)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sarah Stanley. Responses due by 12/22/2021. (jd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sarah Stanley. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demanded Petition and Complaint for Damages, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons for all defendants)(jd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
