Merrill v. USA
| William Argyle Merrill |
| USA |
| 4:2023cv00091 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| B Lynn Winmill |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RETURN MAIL undelivered as to William Merrill - No Longer at this Address. No Forwarding Address Known. re: #4 Order on Motion to Waive,,,, (lm)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING A WAIVER OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND EXTENSION OF TIME - The Governments Motion for Order Granting a Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Extension of Time filed March 30, 2023, 4:23-cv-091-BLW (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. The attorney-client privilege between Petitioner and attorney Tony Sasser is WAIVED as to each of the attributions of ineffective assistance named in Petitioners Motion. Tony Sasser shall make himself available to answer material questions from the Government and to prepare an affidavit within thirty (30) days of entry of this Order. The United States shall file a written response to the Petitioners Motion within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. The Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days thereafter to file any reply brief. The Clerk of Court is directed to file this Order and provide copies to counsel and pro se Petitioner. Signed by Judge B Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines - Governments Responses due by 6/4/2023, Petitioners Replies due by 7/4/2023, Governments Affidavit is due by 5/5/2023. (lm)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Waive Attorney-Client Privilege and Extension of Time Francis Joseph Zebari appearing for Respondent USA. Responses due by 4/20/2023 (Zebari, Francis)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF FILING AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING MOTION PURSUANT TO 28 USC 2255. The United States shall file a written response to the petitioners motion within thirty (30) days from the date of this scheduling order. The petitioner shall have fourteen (14) days thereafter to file any reply brief.Upon receipt of the briefing, the matter will Reference Criminal Case Number 4:18-cr-00267-BLW (lm)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) ( Criminal Action 4:18-cr-267-BLW.), filed by William Argyle Merrill. (Attachments: #1 letter, #2 letter, #3 exhibits, #4 envelope)(alw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Merrill v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Argyle Merrill | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Francis Joseph Zebari |
| Represented By: | Justin K Paskett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
