Michaelson v. Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC et al
Collin Michaelson |
Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC and Andrew Case |
4:2023cv00378 |
August 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Idaho |
Candy W Dale |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STATUS REPORT on Service of Process by Collin Michaelson. (Casperson, DeAnne) |
Filing 3 LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2023 10:00 AM in Telephonic Hearing - Boise Chambers before US Magistrate Judge Candy W Dale. On or before October 26, 2023, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Candy W Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (hs) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew Case, Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC. (Print attached Summons for service.) (Attachments: #1 Andrew Case Summons)(hs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Andrew Case, Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIDDC-2617459.), filed by Collin Michaelson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Casperson, DeAnne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.