Perotto v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sherry Gay Perotto
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2023cv00542
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Presiding Judge: Debora K Grasham
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2024 Filing 9 Administrative Record by Franco Luciano Becia on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 009 Medical Records Part 2, #9 010 Medical Records Part 3, #10 011 Medical Records Part 4, #11 012 Medical Records Part 5)(Becia, Franco)
December 11, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Franco Luciano Becia on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Becia, Franco)
December 7, 2023 Filing 7 ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED TO PROCEED BEFORE A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE(lm)
December 5, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter L Wucetich on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wucetich, Peter)
December 4, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Sherry Gay Perotto re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security,. Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 12/26/2023. (lm)
December 4, 2023 Filing 4 DOCKET ENTRY NOTICE - Notice of Filing of Complaint seeking review under 42 U.S.C. 405(g)- re #1 Complaint for Review of Social Security,. Caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
December 4, 2023 Filing 3 PROCEDURAL ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Debora K Grasham. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (lm)
December 4, 2023 Filing 2 Statement of Social Security Number by Sherry Gay Perotto This is a sealed document.. (Parkinson, Brad)
December 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIDDC-2668514.), filed by Sherry Gay Perotto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Exhibit B: Plaintiff Identification, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parkinson, Brad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perotto v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Gay Perotto
Represented By: Brad D Parkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Peter L Wucetich
Represented By: Franco Luciano Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?