Air Express International USA, Inc. v. VORP Energy International LLC
| Air Express International USA, Inc. doing business as DHL Global Forwarding |
| VORP Energy International LLC |
| VORP Energy International LLC |
| Air Express International USA, Inc. |
| 4:2025cv00523 |
| September 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Amanda K Brailsford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
*DISREGARD*LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a telephonic scheduling conference on March 18, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. mountain time (Boise chambers), for purposes of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan.On or before March 11, 2026, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)Modified on 2/13/2026, see corrective entry (kt).
|
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #15 Litigation Order,, was filed to this case in error. Please disregard.(kt) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #5 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Air Express International USA, Inc..(Griffiths, Kevin) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY - The entry docket number #12 Answer to Counterclaim filed by Air Express International USA, Inc., #13 Certificate of Service filed by Air Express International USA, Inc. was filed incorrectly in this case. The filing party shall re-submit their correct filing.(jd) |
| Filing 13 DISREGARD - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Air Express International USA, Inc. re #12 Answer to Counterclaim (Griffiths, Kevin) Modified on 1/15/2026, see corrective entry (jd). |
| Filing 12 DISREGARD ANSWER to #5 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Air Express International USA, Inc..(Griffiths, Kevin) Modified on 1/15/2026, see corrective entry (jd). |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following deadlines and procedures will govern this litigation: All dispositive motions and motions for punitive damages, must be filed by October 6, 2026. Motions to amend the pleadings, except for allegations of punitive damages, and motions to join parties must be filed on or before April 6, 2026. The parties have chosen to participate in mediation. ADR must be held by September 6, 2026. All fact discovery must be completed by September 6, 2026. The Court may conduct telephonic status conferences with the parties. The Court will set those status conferences in a separate notice. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
|
| Filing 10 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FORM - LITIGATION PLAN by VORP Energy International LLC. (Martin, James) |
| Filing 9 A DECLINATION OF CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE(ac) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by VORP Energy International LLC. (Martin, James) |
Filing 7
LITIGATION ORDER AND NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court will conduct a telephonic scheduling conference on January 6, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. mountain time (Boise chambers), for purposes of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the joint Litigation Plan. On or before December 30, 2025, the parties must file with the Court the joint Litigation Plan and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Amanda K Brailsford. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (ac)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for Air Express International USA, Inc., VORP Energy International LLC re #1 Complaint, #5 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim Consent/Objection to Magistrate due by 1/5/2026. (ac) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM and Demand for Jury Trial against Air Express International USA, Inc. by VORP Energy International LLC.(Martin, James) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint, filed by DHL Global Forwarding, Air Express International USA, Inc.. (Griffiths, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Air Express International USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent DHL Global Forwarding, Corporate Parent DPWN Holdings (USA), Corporate Parent Deutsche Post Beteililgungen Holdings Gmbh, Corporate Parent DHL Group, Corporate Parent Frankfurt Stock Exchange, Corporate Parent DAX for Air Express International USA, Inc.. (Griffiths, Kevin) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY -The entry docket number [1-2] Civil Cover Sheet, filed by DHL Global Forwarding, Air Express International USA, Inc. is not signed. The filing party shall re-submit their correct filing using the CM/ECF event "civil cover sheet".(ac) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Print attached Summons for service.) (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VORP Energy International LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIDDC-2987658.), filed by Air Express International USA, Inc., DHL Global Forwarding. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Griffiths, Kevin) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/10/2025) (jd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.