Taylor-Doyle v. Poehls et al
| Annestra Taylor-Doyle |
| Peoria School District 150, David Poehls, David Nelson, City of Peoria, Illinois, Michael McCoy, Stephen . Smith, Peoria County, Illinois, Steve Sizemore and Jeniffer Steitmatter |
| 1:2007cv01048 |
| March 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Peoria |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/8/10granting 92 Motion for Summary Judgment: FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, Nelson and the City of Peoria's Motion for Summary Judgment [#92] is GRANTED. (See written order) (TK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/2/10 GRANTING Sizemore's 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. SEE FULL ORDER ATTACHED.(FDT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 1/29/10. Plaintiff Annestra Taylor-Doyle's 115 Motion to Alter the Court's December 28, 2009 Order or Allow Plaintiff Leave to Submit Her Affidavits Giving Opinion on Credibility of S.T. and Sh.T. is DENIED. SEE FULL ORDER ATTACHED. (FDT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 12/28/09 denying 101 Motion to Strike Testimony. SEE FULL ORDER ATTACHED. (FDT, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
