Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Taylor v. Diaz et al
as 1:2026cv05196
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walter Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Monica Diaz, Cyndee Rojas, Stephen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho, et al
as 26-2100
Plaintiff:
JARROD LOWREY
Defendant:
CITY OF RIO RANCHO, RIO RANCHO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, RIO RANCHO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Smith v. Xerox Corp.
as 2:2026cv02090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Valiollahi et al v. Ginn Creek Investments, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv00016
Plaintiff:
Matthew Valiollahi and Stephen Smith
Defendant:
Ginn Creek Investments, LLC, Ginn Creek, LLC, Southern Land Protectors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Natali-Rodriquez v. West Dundee Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv00243
Defendant:
West Dundee Police Department, Michael Slager, Steve Bruendy and others
:
Service List
Plaintiff:
Cesar Natali-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salgado-Fernandez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13615
Plaintiff:
Nilo Salgado-Fernandez, Pete Salinas, Melissa L. Chrysler and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Douglas v. Smith
as 3:2025cv09669
Petitioner:
James Douglas
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsel v. Smith
as 25-6960
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LETRICE TOWNSEL, Warden
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
STEPHEN SMITH
Salgado-Fernandez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv09046
Plaintiff:
Nilo Salgado-Fernandez, Pete Salinas, Melissa L. Chrysler and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
