Span v. Melvin et al
| Samuel Span |
| Michael Melvin, Emily Ruskin, Teri Kennedy, Kelly Renzi, John Soko, Sara Cheshareck, Andrea Moss, Barbara Browning, Crystal Carlson, Jessica L Otto, K Ortega, Melvin Hinton, John Baldwin, John and Jane Doe, Andrew Kromiga, Smith and Michelle Howell |
| 1:2018cv01078 |
| February 21, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 6/12/2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO: 1) Dismiss all Defendants except Andrew Kromiga and K. Ortega for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted p ursuant to by 28 U.S.C. §1915A; 2) add Defendant Lieutenant Taylor; 3) deny Plaintiff's motion (exhibit) as moot, 6 ; 4) grant Plaintiff's motion to supplement, 10 ; 5) deny Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, [5, 1 3]; 6) deny Plaintiff's motions for status update as moot, [11, 12, 13]; 7) attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; 8) set an internal court deadline 60 days from the entry of this order for the court to check on the status of service and enter scheduling deadlines and 9) enter the Court's standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. See full written Order. (VH, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
