Williams v. Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
| Glenn Williams |
| Warden, Dixon Correctional Center |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 1:2019cv01364 |
| November 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/18/2019. On 12/16/2019, Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #11 was forwarded to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals; the Motion will be resolved in Petitioner's case before that Court. The Clerk is therefore directed to terminate the Motion for Appointment of Counsel #11 appearing on this Docket. (EWL, ilcd)
|
| Filing 16 CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) FEE NOTICE re #6 Notice of Appeal. (JS, ilcd) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/13/2019. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. #10 ) is DENIED, the Court CERTIFIES the appeal was not taken in good faith, and Petitioner's Motion for Production of Record on Appeal (Doc. #12 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(4), the Clerk is directed to immediately notify the parties and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that this Court has denied Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis and has certified his appeal is not taken in good faith because it is frivolous. The Clerk is also directed to forward Petitioner's Motion to Request Counsel (Doc. #11 ) to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (JS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Glenn Williams. USCA Case Number 19-3415. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 13 Short Record of Appeal Sent to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Production of Record on Appeal by Petitioner Glenn Williams. Responses due by 12/23/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Glenn Williams. Responses due by 12/23/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Petitioner Glenn Williams. Responses due by 12/23/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 9 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Glenn Williams re #6 Notice of Appeal. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability by Glenn Williams. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 7 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT by Glenn Williams re #6 Notice of Appeal. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241 & 2254) by Glenn Williams. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. (JS, ilcd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/26/2019. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. #1 ) is summarily DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (JS, ilcd)
|
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 14626035742. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Glenn Williams. Responses due by 11/27/2019 (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Glenn Williams. (JS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Glenn Williams.(JS, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
