Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James Smith v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 23-1957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Means v. Warden Dixon Correctional Center
as 3:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Joel Means
Defendant:
Warden Dixon Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Warden Dixon Correctional Center
as 3:2023cv03131
Plaintiff:
Joel Means
Defendant:
Warden Dixon Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armfield v. Williams
as 22-1263
Petitioner:
RUSSELL ARMFIELD
Respondent:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
Jackson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Jackson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Justin Wilks, Warden Dixon Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Sonja Nicklaus, et al
as 21-1461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMBER ALLEN, Health Care Unit Administrator, SONJA NICKLAUS, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center, ROB JEFFRIES, Placement Officer and others
Williams v. Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
as 1:2019cv01364
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Glenn Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Lewis v. John Baldwin, et al
as 16-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, DONALD ENLOE, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center, JOHN DOE, Dixon and Lee County Fire Department and Mayor of Lee County, and others and others
Duplichan v. Dixon Correction Center
as 2:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jody Duplichan, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Dixon Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
