Wage v. Precision Planting Inc et al
Plaintiff: Shari Wage
Defendant: Precision Planting Inc and Aerotek Inc
Case Number: 1:2023cv01388
Filed: October 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jonathan E Hawley
Referring Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Hillary Lee Klein terminated as counsel of record for Defendant Aerotek, Inc. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/5/23. (WG)
December 4, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney // Hillary L. Klein by Defendant Aerotek Inc. Responses due by 12/18/2023 (Klein, Hillary)
December 4, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Christina Pyle Engle on behalf of Aerotek Inc (Engle, Christina)
December 4, 2023 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Precision Planting Inc.(Boron, Justin)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: This case is set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 1/5/2024 at 9:30 AM via telephone. Counsel are to phone into conference by calling (551) 285-1373 and enter the Meeting ID: 16009516536 when prompted to do so. Please announce your name each prior to speaking unless the judge asks a question directly to you so time that the speaker may be identified by all. A discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) shall be filed on or before 1/2/2024. The parties may, but are not required to, follow the format of the sample discovery plan set forth as Attachment A to the standing order attached to this text order. If the complaint makes allegations on behalf of a class, the proposed discovery plan should include a deadline for filing a motion to certify class at a stage early in the the case. The Discovery Plan event may be found in the CM/ECF system within the other Documents category. All counsel must read and be familiar with the standing order attached to this text order prior to their Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/29/2023. (WG)
November 28, 2023 Filing 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Aerotek Inc. (Klein, Hillary)
November 28, 2023 Filing 11 AEROTEK INC.'S ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Aerotek Inc.(Klein, Hillary)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #10 Defendant Precision Planting, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Precision Planting Inc.'s responsive pleading is due 12/4/2023. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 11/13/23. (WG)
November 10, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Defendant Precision Planting Inc. Responses due by 12/4/2023 (Boron, Justin)
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Aerotek Inc answer due 11/28/2023. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 11/3/2023. (VH)
November 3, 2023 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) by Defendant Aerotek Inc. Responses due by 11/17/2023 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Klein, Hillary)
October 24, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shari Wage. Precision Planting Inc served on 10/23/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (Taylor, Alexander)
October 20, 2023 Filing 6 Alias Summons Issued as to Precision Planting Inc. (VH)
October 18, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shari Wage. Aerotek Inc served on 10/17/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. (Taylor, Alexander)
October 13, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Aerotek Inc, Precision Planting Inc. (VH)
October 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Shari Wage (Volheim, Nathan)
October 12, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Alexander James Taylor on behalf of Shari Wage (Taylor, Alexander)
October 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aerotek Inc, Precision Planting Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4318874.), filed by Shari Wage. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Taylor, Alexander)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wage v. Precision Planting Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shari Wage
Represented By: Nathan Charles Volheim
Represented By: Alexander James Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Precision Planting Inc
Represented By: Justin J Boron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerotek Inc
Represented By: Christina Pyle Engle
Represented By: Hillary Lee Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?