Curry v. Dollar General et al
| Celeste J Curry |
| Dollar General, Alexis Chaplain, Laura and Eldon Heaton |
| 1:2024cv01099 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT entered. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER and OPINION entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/9/2024. Plaintiff's #2 , #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED and Plaintiff's #3 , #6 Motion to Request Counsel is MOOT. The Court DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This case is now TERMINATED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 6
REDACTED MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Celeste J Curry. Responses due by 4/18/2024. (MJC)
|
|
Filing 5
REDACTED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Celeste J Curry. Responses due by 4/18/2024. (MJC)
|
|
Filing 4
REDACTED COMPLAINT against Alexis Chaplain, Dollar General, Eldon Heaton, Laura, filed by Celeste J Curry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM 285)(MJC)
|
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER: On 02/28/2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff "to promptly file redacted copies of the Complaint, Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and the Motion to Request Counsel that contain only the minor's initials," and reminded Plaintiff that she must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Civil Local Rule 5.11(A) in all filings submitted to the Court. Text Order on 02/28/2024. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with that Order. Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Plaintiff must file redacted copies of the #1 Complaint, #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and the #3 Motion to Request Counsel that contain only the minor's initials in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Civil Local Rule 5.11(A). Plaintiff is further WARNED that if she fails to comply with this Order, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 03/22/2024. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Celeste J Curry. Responses due by 3/13/2024. (MJC)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Celeste J Curry. Responses due by 3/13/2024. (MJC)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Alexis Chaplain, Dollar General, Eldon Heaton, Laura, filed by Celeste J Curry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 USM 285)(MJC)
|
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff has filed a #1 Complaint, #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and #3 Motion to Request Counsel, all of which contain the name of an individual known to be a minor. The Clerk is directed to place all three documents #1 , #2 , #3 UNDER SEAL. The Plaintiff is directed to promptly file redacted copies of the Complaint, Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, and the Motion to Request Counsel that contain only the minor's initials. The Plaintiff must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and Civil Local Rule 5.11(A) in all filings submitted to the Court. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 2/28/2024. (KZ)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
