Collins v. Leibach et al
| Ray Charles Collins |
| Robert Mitchell, Alexander Ramm, Eugene McAdory and Roger E Walker |
| 2:2004cv02148 |
| July 30, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Vermilion |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 2/5/08. 1.Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 56(c), the defendants unopposed summaryjudgment motion is granted 59 . The clerk of the court is directed to enterjudgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. 2.Any remaining matters are rendered moot, and this case is terminated, with theparties to bear their own costs.3.If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he may file a notice of appeal wi ththis court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Amotion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiffplans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If the plaintiff do eschoose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective ofthe outcome of the appeal. Furthermore, if the appeal is found to be non-meritorious, the plaintiff may also accumulate another strike under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). See written order. (KW, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
