Davis v. City of Springfield et al
| Rickey B Davis |
| City of Springfield, Timothy J Davlin, Donald Kliment and William Rouse |
| 3:2007cv03096 |
| April 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Sangamon |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| Jeanne E. Scott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION - Plaintiff Rickey B. Davis' Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (d/e 311) and Defendant City of Springfield's Bill of Costs (d/e 301) are ALLOWED in part. The Court taxes costs in Case No. 04-3168 in favor of the City of Springfield and against Rickey B.Davis in the sum of $9,675.90; and the Court awards attorney fees and expenses in Case No. 07-3096 in favor of Rickey B. Davis and against the City of Springfield in the sum of $276,123.98, consisti ng of $252,131.75 in attorney fees and $23,992.23 in expenses. The Clerk is directed to amend the Judgments (d/e 300 & 307) to reflect the respective awards of costs and attorney fees and expenses. These consolidated cases are closed. Entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 1/22/2010. (CT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION entered by Judge Jeanne E. Scott on 11/20/2009. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Original docketed in case number 04-3168. Case closed per instructions of Court. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
