Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Edgar Harris, et al v. City of Springfield, et al
as 26-2999
Plaintiff:
Edgar Harris and Michele Kimberly Harris
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Clerk's Office, Catherine L. Hanaway and others
Paulson v. City of Springfield, South Dakota et al
as 4:2026cv04183
Plaintiff:
William F. Paulson
Defendant:
City of Springfield, South Dakota, Scott Kostal, Steve Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Dickerson v. City of Springfield Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lavar Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Springfield Illinois and Joseph Felchner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamie Matthews v. City of Springfield, et al
as 26-2908
Plaintiff:
JAMIE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, STEVEN ALICEA, Officer and GINO MALDONADO, Officer
Ryder v. City of Springfield, et al.
as 26-5474
Plaintiff:
CHIARA RYDER
Defendant:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Officer KIRSTEN CARDWELL, in her official capacity, Officer TOM SLABBERT, in his official capacity and others
Butler v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv03274
Plaintiff:
Chavise Butler
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Graham CC, Sangamon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv30135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perkins v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2026cv01673
Plaintiff:
Nolan Anthony Perkins
Defendant:
City of Springfield and Jordan Parado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Claunch et al
as 6:2026cv03471
Plaintiff:
Melody Roberts
Defendant:
Michael Claunch and City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
