Farris v. Kohl et al
| Jacqueline Farris |
| Eric Kohl, Erik Kohlrus, Christine Brannon, Clara Charron, Norine Ashley, Lisa Johnson, Patrick Keane, Mike Funk, Felipe Zavala, Alan Pasley, J. Woolfolk, Matthew Mitchey, James Barry, William Lemon, A. Adams, Snyder, Jones, Locke and Unknown Logan Correctional Internal Affairs Investigators |
| 3:2017cv03279 |
| November 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Adams |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER AND OPINION entered by Judge Sue E Myerscough on 9/29/2023. IT IS ORDERED that The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Locke and Snyder (d/e 215 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Judgment shall enter in favor of these Defend ants on Count V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The motion is otherwise DENIED. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Brannon, Charron, Ashley, Johnson, Adams, and Gabor (d/e 217 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. J udgment shall enter in favor of these Defendants on Counts V and VI of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The motion is otherwise DENIED, except that Defendants may renew their motion for summary judgment on Count XIII after trial. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Keane, Funk, and Pasley (d/e 219 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Judgment shall enter in favor of these Defendants on Count V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The motion is otherwise DE NIED, except that Defendants may renew their motion for summary judgment on Count XIII after trial. A status conference in this matter is hereby SET for October 12, 2023, at 2:30 p.m. Counsel for all partiesincluding counsel for Defendant Kohlrusshal l participate by videoconference, the instructions for which are attached. Counsel should be prepared to discuss (1) the status of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kohlrus and (2) new trial settings. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (Attachments: # 1 Zoom-MYERSCOUGHT Instructions for PC)(HS)
|
|
Filing
255
ORDER and OPINION: Plaintiff Jacqueline Farris's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, see d/e 223 , is GRANTED. Defendant IDOC's Motion for Summary Judgment, see d/e 213 , is DENIED. Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff on Counts VIII and IX as to Defendant's liability. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/13/2023. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (HS)
|
|
Filing
205
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff Jacqueline Farris' Motion to Strike Defendants' Rule 26(a)(2)(C) Disclosure of Ryan Nottingham 201 is DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
160
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff Jacqueline Farris' Renewed Motion for Leave to Take Depositions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) 150 is ALLOWED in part. The Court modifies the sched ule of this case with respect to Farris' claims against the Department Defendants as follows: Fact Discovery due by 2/3/2020; Plaintiff`s Expert Disclosure due by 3/4/2020; Department Defendant`s Expert Disclosure due by 4/6/2020; Expe rt Discovery due by 5/4/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 5/18/2020. See written order. Final Pretrial Conference set 6/1/2020 is CANCELLED and reset 8/31/2020 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 1 in Springfield before U.S. District Judge Sue E. Myerscough. Jury Trial set 6/16/2020 is CANCELLED and reset 9/15/2020 at 9:00 AM before Judge Myerscough. (LB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
117
OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Defendants' Fifth Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Requests 106 is DENIED as moot; and Plaintiff's Third Motion to Compel Discovery Respon ses and Response to Defendants' Fifth Motion for Extension of Time 108 and the matters reserved by the Court from Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Defendants to Participate in Discovery and to Enforce this Court's October 5, 2018 Order 102 are ALLOWED in part. The Department Defendants are directed to provide any missing verifications of answers to interrogatories by February 15, 2019. The Department Defendants are ordered to produce the additional discovery responses calle d for in this Opinion by February 28, 2019. The Court further ALLOWS Plaintiff's requests for fees and expenses incurred in filing her Motions as stated above. The Court directs Plaintiff to file a statement of the fees and expenses incurred in filing her two Motions at issue by February 22, 2019. The Department Defendants are given until March 22, 2019, to respond to the statement of fees and expenses.The existing Revised Scheduling Order 92 in this case provides that fact discovery is t o be completed on or before March 1, 2019, and that the parties have until April 1, 2019 to complete expert discovery. Given the necessity to resolve the numerous discovery disputes between the parties, it appears to the Court that the existing scheduling deadlines are unrealistic and, probably, untenable. Consequently, the Court orders the parties to confer and present a revised discovery schedule to the Court on or before February 28, 2019. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
