Arrington v. Sullivan et al
| Otis Clarence Arrington |
| Brandon Shrader, GTL Lexis Advice, John Baldwin, John Doe, Clark, Sullivan, Hammers, Dave White and Sarah Johnson |
| 3:2019cv03058 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (LN, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Rock Island Division, 131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801. Merit Review Deadline set for 3/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues) (LN, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (LN, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Otis Clarence Arrington. (LN, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Otis Clarence Arrington. Responses due by 3/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(LN, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Otis Clarence Arrington. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Continued, #2 Complaint Continued, #3 Complaint Continued) (LN, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
