Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Campbell v. Clark et al
as 2:2026cv04609
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Gina Clark, Wellpath LLC, John Doe Corrections Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2026cv02974
Plaintiff:
Robert Clark
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Campbell v. Clark et al
as 2:2026cv04608
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Gina Clark, Wellpath LLC, John Doe Corrections Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02620
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Clarke
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark v. Safeway, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02319
Plaintiff:
Debbie Clark
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Rutherford
as 3:2026cv02184
Plaintiff:
Ivery Clark Williams
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demir v. Blouir
as 1:2026cv12909
Plaintiff:
Buse Demir
Defendant:
Samuel Clark Blouir
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1182 Defend. Denial of Pla. Appl. for Alien Employment Cer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jonathan Leonis-Moore et al v. Naphcare Healthcare et al
as 2:2026cv01979
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Leonis-Moore
Defendant:
Naphcare Healthcare, Clark County Detention Center, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
