Croom v. Clague et al
| Christopher Croom |
| David Clague, Craig Carpenter and Brad Abernathy |
| 4:2015cv04116 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Knox |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MERIT REVIEW OPINION - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/23/2016. ( Rule 16 Deadline 4/25/2016.). Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 9 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Motions for Statu s 10 and 12 are rendered MOOT. 2.This case shall proceed solely on the federal claim(s) identified herein. Any claims not identified will not be included in the case, except in the Court's discretion upon motion by a party for good cause sh own, or by leave of court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Glossip and Abernathy are DISMISSED. Sheriff Clague will remain a Defendant for the limited purpose of helping to identify the Doctor Doe who was allegedly deliber ately indifferent to Plaintiff. Doctor Doe is to be added as a Defendant in this case. The Clerk is directed to send to each Defendant pursuant to this District's internal procedures: 1) a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service; 2) a Waiver of Service; 3) a copy of the Complaint; and 4) a copy of this Order. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
