Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Oliver, III v. United States of America et al
as 2:2025cv01384
Plaintiff:
Eddie Van Oliver, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Mental Health Industry, Marijuana Industry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Oliver, III v. Mental Health Industry et al
as 2:2025cv01380
Plaintiff:
Eddie Van Oliver, III
Defendant:
Mental Health Industry, Cannabis, Twin Valley Behavioral Healthcare Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Oliver III v. Hoffman Huffman et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eddie Van Oliver III
Defendant:
David Hoffman Huffman, Susan Fuhman, Robert Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Carpenter v. Gregory Pest Solutions, Inc.
as 6:2019cv02079
Defendant:
GREGORY PEST SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARK CRAIG CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Craig Carpenter v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2019cv01146
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Craig Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Geiger v. Meyer's RV Centers LLC d/b/a Camping World RV Sales et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
Bethann Geiger
Defendant:
Meyer's RV Centers , Brian Emke and Craig Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eric McKinney v. Craig Carpenter, et al
as 16-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC K. MCKINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG CARPENTER, Lieutenant Knox County Jail, BRAD ABERNATHY, Chief, TIM ROBINSON, Deputy of the Knox County Jail and others
Amick v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2015cv04131
Plaintiff:
James L Amick, Sr.
Defendant:
Craig Carpenter, Dave Cleque, Dave Caslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croom v. Clague et al
as 4:2015cv04116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
David Clague, Craig Carpenter and Brad Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Clague et al
as 1:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mabry
Defendant:
David Clague and Craig Carpenter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
