Coleman v. Hilgendorf et al
| Dwaine Coleman |
| Hilgendorf, Pucecell, Carruthers, Bryant, Sheperd, Jones, Gary Millard, Becbero King, Stphanie Docethy and Steve Gens |
| 4:2016cv04257 |
| December 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Knox |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Entered by Judge Sara Darrow on 10/26/2017. See written Order. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Gans, Sheppard, Jones, Bryant, Carrothers, Millard, and King are dismissed without pre judice. Clerk is directed to terminate these defendants. Defendants Motion to Stay Discovery 21 is DENIED as moot. As of the date of this Order, Defendant Pucecell has not returned an executed request for waiver of service. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to attempt service a second time on Defendant Pucecell via the standard procedures. (ED, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 2/2/2017. See written Order. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate Stephanie Dorethy and Wexford Health Sources, Inc., as defendants. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the remaining defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. (ED, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
