Rogers v. Raoul et al
Udell Rogers |
Dorrie Love, Chad Schuldt, Craig Findley, Lloyd Sichling, Kwame Raoul, Jane and John Does, Rob Jeffreys, Stanley Simonson and Roy Little |
4:2021cv04048 |
March 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
James E Shadid |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 4/1/2021, in the amount of $30.83; receipt number 14626040285 (AH) |
Filing 8 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. (SAG) |
|
Filing 7 Letter from Clerk of Court to Hill CC Trust Fund Dept. requesting ledgers 9/16/20 through 3/17/21 (SAG) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 4/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Udell Rogers. Responses due by 3/30/2021 (SAG) |
Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Udell Rogers (SAG) |
Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Udell Rogers.(SAG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Udell Rogers.(SAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.