Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Rodriguez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Rodriguez, III
Defendant:
Virginia Martinez, Craig Findley, Christine Brannon-Dortch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50309
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Dawson
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Tarry Williams, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avant v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordell Avant v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 23-1879
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORDELL AVANT
Respondent / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, DANIELLE CORYLE and CRAIG FINDLEY
Avant v. Jefferies et al
as 1:2023cv01100
Petitioner:
Cordell Avant
Respondent:
Rob Jefferies, Danielle Coryle and Craig Findley
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Chatman v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 23-1401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CHATMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, BRENDAN F. KELLY and CRAIG FINDLEY
Chatman v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Paul Chatman
Defendant:
Rob L Jeffreys, Brendan F Kelly and Craig Findley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Gill v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY GILL
Defendant / Appellee:
J.B. PRITZKER, CRAIG FINDLEY, ANGIE ASHBROCK and others
Shafer v. Danley et al
as 2:2021cv02284
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shafer
Defendant:
Jesse Danley, Teresa Righter, Steve Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
