Frison v. Department of the Army et al
| William Henry Frison, Jr |
| Department of the Army, Captain Thomas Robrecht, Sammy Stokes, Private Leroy Daniels, III, Robert Herff, Private Carter, Drill Sergeant Phil Mickelson and John Graupmann |
| 4:2025cv04016 |
| January 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STRICKEN pursuant to 2/11/25 Text Order - AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Henry Frison, Jr.(ANW) Modified on 2/11/2025 to strike (ANW). |
TEXT ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 2/11/25. Docket entry #4 is hereby stricken as it was entered erroneously in the incorrect case.(ANW)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff William Henry Frison, Jr. Responses due by 2/21/2025. (SB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William Henry Frison, Jr. Responses due by 1/31/2025. (SB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Henry Frison, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit OMB Form 1105-0008, #2 Exhibit Case Law, #3 Exhibit Transcript, #4 Exhibit Medical Documents)(SB) Filing fee not paid.Modified on 1/17/2025 (SB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
