Furry et al v. United States Of America
| David Furry, Diane Nye and Tina Nye |
| United States Of America |
| 1:2008cv06138 |
| October 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle Office |
| Cook |
| Blanche M. Manning |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 39:409 Postal Service |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 3/13/2012:Mailed notice(rth, )
|
|
Filing
104
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 5/10/2011: The government's motions in limine are decided as follows: [97-1] is granted, [98-1] is denied, and [99-1] is denied without prejudice to renewal at trial. Government mot ion in limine [100-1] is denied without prejudice given that the motion seeks relief identical to that sought in a motion being briefed before the magistrate judge. Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 5/10/2011.Mailed notice. [For further detail see minute order.](kj, )
|
|
Filing
94
MOTION for summary judgment 83 is denied; WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 3/17/2011: Defendant United States of America's motion for summary judgment [83-1] is denied. The parties shall report for a status hearing on March 31, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., and shall be prepared to set a date for trial.Mailed notice(rth, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
