Harper v. Dart et al
| Randolph Troy Harper, Sr |
| Thomas Dart, Sergeant Meyers, Ms Hernandez, C/O Schultz, Y. Yu, Medical Doctor Ali, Correctional Officer Capers, Ms. Price, Dr. Kapotas, Thomas Keel and Correctional Officer Valeda |
| 1:2010cv03873 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 5/3/2011.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
7
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 7/6/2010: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc 3 ) is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff submitting a completed application. Plaintiff's complaint is dis missed without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must: (1) either submit a completed in forma pauperis application or prepay the $350 filing fee, and (2) submit an amended complaint that clearly states his claims. Th e clerk shall send another in forma pauperis application and an amended complaint form to Plaintiff. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Doc 4 ) is denied without prejudice. (For further details see minute order.) Mailed notice(gmr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
