Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MATTHEWS v. WITT et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MS. WITT, RNS CREVELING, MS. SHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. GOOD et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SERGEANT GOOD, LIEUTENANT HUSTOSKY, SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00078
Defendant:
J. Adkins, J. Preston, Officer Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolentino v. Xve et al
as 3:2019cv01363
Defendant:
Mrs. P Price, Mr. Cousins, Ms. Baldauf and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tolentino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKendall v. Deville et al
as 1:2019cv00149
Plaintiff:
Antonio Joseph McKendall
Defendant:
Warden Deville, Ms Herns, Ms Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Winnfield Correctional Center et al
as 1:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L Calloway
Defendant:
Ms Herns, State of Louisiana, Warden Deville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinlaw v. Nwaokocha et al
as 3:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Kinlaw
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Nwaokocha , Ms. Price, Ms. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Dr. Saddiq, Jeff Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER et al v. BUTTS et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Defendant:
DOCTOR BORDINE, KIETH BUTTS, MS. PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNTER, ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY-SIX PRISONERS and RICHARD OSBORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Beightler et al
as 3:2013cv02609
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
M. Beightler, McKee, Ms. Master and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
