MATTHEWS v. WITT et al
JAMAR MATTHEWS |
MS. WITT, RNS CREVELING, MS. SHOFF, SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH, MS. D. VARNER, JENNIFER SCHROCK, MS. HOLLABAUGH, MS. HOOVER and MS. PRICE |
3:2023cv00202 |
August 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Keith A Pesto |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JAMAR MATTHEWS. (sdp) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JAMAR MATTHEWS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sdp) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JAMAR MATTHEWS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sdp) |
Filing 3 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 cover letter, #3 Envelope) (sdp) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING: The Clerk will mark this matter administratively closed (that is not a final dismissal of this action) until plaintiff Matthews pays the filing fee or files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis as explained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 9/13/2023. Copy mailed to non-ECF user. (bgs) |
Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.