Day v. River Forest School District 90 et al
| Michael Day |
| River Forest School District 90, Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent of River Forest School District 90 |
| 1:2010cv04426 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Blanche M. Manning |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
280
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations 278 Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 9/26/2014: No objections having been filed, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation 278 in full and orders Day to pay a sanction of $250.00 to defendants on or before 10/31/2014. Mailed notice (mgh, )
|
|
Filing
206
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/19/2013. Mailed notice(cjg, )
|
|
Filing
160
WRITTEN Opinion entered on 9/4/2012: Plaintiff Michael Days objections to various rulings of the assigned magistrate judge 148 are overruled. Consistent with this courts April 23, 2012, order, the defendants may file a dispositive motion without obtaining further permission from this court. Any such motion shall be filed by October 2, 2012. The response shall be filed by November 2, 2012. The reply shall be filed by November 16, 2012. The ruling shall be by mail unless the parties are otherwise notified. (for further details see attached order)Mailed notice(tlp, )
|
|
Filing
94
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 9/29/2011: The defendants' motion to stay [65-1] is denied, Day's motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint [68-1] is granted, and the motion to dismiss the Second Amen ded Complaint [63-1] is denied as moot. The clerk is directed to file as a separately docketed entry Day's proposed Third Amended Complaint, which iscurrently attached as Exhibit 1 to Day's motion for leave [68-1]. The docket entry shall re fer to the document as the Third Amended Complaint. On its own motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f), the court strikes from paragraph 11 of the Third Amended Complaint the following sentences: "Plaintiff has attempted to acquire wo rk from the defendant as a regular teacher filling out an on-line application (2006-2007 school year). The defendant did not give plaintiff a position as a regular teacher. Plaintiff is better qualified thanother teachers that the district hired and those not in plaintiff's protected class, non-white (black persons)." The defendants shall file their answer or other responsive pleading no later than October 25, 2011. Mailed notice(rth, )
|
|
Filing
33
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 3/17/2011: The returns of service against the individual defendants are quashed, and the motion to dismiss [19-1] is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Count I is dismissed wi th prejudice as untimely; the motion to dismiss Count IV against the individual defendants is denied without prejudice as premature; and the motion to dismiss Count IV against the River Forest School District is denied. The parties shall report for a status hearing on May 31, 2011, at 11:00 a.m.Mailed notice(rth, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
