Cases 1 - 10 of 16,733
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-2504
Petitioner:
DENNIS D CORBRAY and Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Sinkevitch v. Cain
as 24-2508
Petitioner:
BRETT A. SINKEVITCH
Respondent:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00651
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KING v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
KEIFF KING
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Acting Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
CASTRO-MOTA v. GALLAGHER et al.
as 2:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT GALLAGHER, CO OFFICER and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, SGT. SIPES, SGT. VERESHACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Herrera v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1663
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HERRERA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
