Cases 1 - 10 of 17,719
Muhammad v. Superintendent Mason
as 2:2025cv02124
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Etan
as 2:2025cv00683
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Superintendant Jamie Miller Etan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jessica Brink v. John Bormann, et al
as 25-1805
Plaintiff:
JESSICA M. BRINK
Defendant:
JOHN BORMANN, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent and Chief AdministrativeOfficer of the Rumson School District and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF RUMSON IN THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, a body politic and corporate
Armoni Johnson v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 25-1809
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Superintendent, KERI MOORE, AMY WHEARY and others
Shawn Hamilton v. Mark Brothers, et al
as 25-1759
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON
Defendant:
MARK BROTHERS, Superintendent, AMY VARNER, C-Unit Manager and DONALD BECHOTA, H-Unit Manager
Oden v. Arnold
as 25-2677
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J ODEN
Respondent:
KARIN ARNOLD, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
J.S. v. Kent School District, et al.
as 25-2702
Plaintiff:
J.S.
Defendant:
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, RYAN PRIES, Principal and ISRAEL VILLA, Superintendent
Zapata v. Montegari et al
as 1:2025cv02297
Plaintiff:
Bryan J. Zapata
Defendant:
Superintendent Montegari, Watch Commander Newcombe, Supervisor Okay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Matthews v. John Decker, et al
as 25-1783
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS
Defendant:
JOHN D. DECKER, Pennsylvania State Trooper, JESSICA WILLIAMS, Pennsylvania State Trooper, ROBERT NORTON, Pennsylvania State Trooper and others
Loi Nghiem v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 25-1773
Plaintiff:
LOI NGOC NGHIEM
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
