Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14253
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Joudeh v. Napoli
as 1:2026cv08070
Petitioner:
Akram Joudeh
Respondent:
Superintendent Thomas Napoli and Attorney General Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00744
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farabee v. Director of the Virginia Department of Correcitons et al
as 2:2026cv00970
Petitioner:
Brian Farabee
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Correcitons, Superintendent of Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail and Commissioner of the Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Huggins v. Yehl
as 1:2026cv08049
Petitioner:
Henry Huggins
Respondent:
Superintendent Christopher Yehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker, III v. Washburn
as 26-6010
Petitioner:
ERNEST HAROLD BAKER, III
Respondent:
SUE WASHBURN, SUPERINTENDENT
Green v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv01899
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Green
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent Joe Woodland and Dr. Siegerzma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Price v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv11207
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Price
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Superintendent Johnson, T. Lee and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
