In Re: Unified Messaging Solutions LLC Patent Litigation
| The Vanguard Group, Inc., The Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Yahoo! Inc., Twitter, Inc., eBay, Inc., Verizon Data Services LLC, Comcast Cable Communication LLC, Intuit, Inc., VMWare, Inc. and Homestead Technologies Inc. |
| Unified Messaging Solutions LLC Patent Litigation |
| 1:2012cv06286 |
| August 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Joan H. Lefkow |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
805
SECOND AMENDED Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to declare this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (dkt. 745, 750), joined by defendants General Electric Capital Services, Inc. and BMO Harris Bank (dkts. 752, 753), and supported by defendants Scottrade, Inc. and Orbitz LLC (dkts. 741, 746), is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants are awarded a reasonable attorney's fee under § 285 for the portion of the litigation identified above. The parties are to proceed under LR 54.3(d). Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 10/19/2015. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
|
Filing
795
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants Twitter, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc.'s motion to declare this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (dkt. 745, 750), joined by defendants General Electric Capital Services, Inc. a nd BMO Harris Bank (dkts. 752, 753), and supported by defendants Scottrade, Inc. and Orbitz LLC (dkts. 741, 746), is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants are awarded a reasonable attorney's fee under § 285 for the portion of the litigation identified above. The parties are to proceed under LR 54.3(d). Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 10/1/2015. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
|
Filing
794
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to declare his case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (dkt. 745, 750) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants are awarded a reasonable attorney' s fee under § 285 for the portion of the litigation identified above. The parties are to proceed under LR 54.3(d). Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 9/29/2015. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
|
Filing
608
Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 9/25/2013: The UOL defendants' motion for sanctions under Rule 11 [dkt. 536] and the first and second wave defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings [dkt. 561] are denied. UMS is directed by October 16, 2013 to join AMT as an additional party, the entity that would allow it to maintain standing to sue defendants for infringement of the patents in suit.Mailed notice(mad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
