Halo Creative & Design Limited et al v. Comptoir Des Indes, Inc. et al
| Halo Creative & Design Limited, Halo Trademarks Limited and Halo Americas Limited |
| Comptoir Des Indes Inc., CDI International, CDI Furniture and David Quaknine |
| 1:2014cv08196 |
| October 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
270
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Defendant CDI's Petition for Recognition and Motion to Stay Proceedings pending bankruptcy [Dkt. Nos. 249, 261] and Defendant CDI's Motion for a New Trial or, i n the alternative, for this Court to amend the judgment [Dkt. No. 231]. The Court grants Plaintiff Halo's Motion to declare this case an exceptional case and grant enhanced damages [Dkt. Nos. 222, 223] and doubles the damages. The Court also grants in part and denies in part Halo's bill of costs. Enter memorandum opinion and order. Status hearing/ruling set for 10/3/18 is vacated. No appearance is needed. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/2/201. Mailed notice(maf)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/29/2015. (rm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
