Cases
Concepts Design Furniture, Inc., et al v. Fisher & Broyles LLP, et al
as 22-2303
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONCEPTS DESIGN FURNITURE, INC., COMPTOIR DES INDES INC., DAVID QUAKNINE and others
Defendant / Appellee: FISHER & BROYLES LLP, also known as FisherBroyles LLP and ALASTAIR J. WARR
Concepts Design Furniture, Inc. et al v. Fisher & Broyles LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01086
Plaintiff: CONCEPTS DESIGN FURNITURE, INC., COMPTOIR DES INDES INC. and David Quaknine
Defendant: FISHERBROYLES, LLP., ALASTAIR J WARR and Fisher & Broyles LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Halo Creative & Design Limited, a Hong Kong company v. Halo Trademarks Limited, a Hong Kong company et al
as 2:2019cv00182
Defendant: Halo Americas Limited, a Hong Kong company, Container Direct International Furniture, Inc. dba Meubles Conteneur Direct International, Inc., Quaknine Concept Design Innovation Furniture, Inc. dbaMeubles de Concept Design et Innovation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Halo Creative & Design Limited, a Hong Kong company
Halo Creative & Design Limited, a Hong Kong company et al v. Comptoir Des Indes, Inc., a Quebec corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00183
Plaintiff: Halo Americas Limited, a Hong Kong company, Halo Trademarks Limited, a Hong Kong company and Halo Creative & Design Limited, a Hong Kong company
Defendant: Container Direct International Furniture, Inc. (dba Meubles Conteneur Direct International, Inc.), CDI Furniture, CDI International and others
Halo Creative & Design Limited et al v. Comptoir Des Indes, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv08196
Plaintiff: Halo Creative & Design Limited , Halo Trademarks Limited and Halo Americas Limited
Defendant: Comptoir Des Indes Inc. , CDI International, CDI Furniture and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?