Harrison v. Stateville Correctional Center et al
| Bobby Lee Harrison |
| Stateville Correctional Center, Wexford Health Sources Inc of Illinois, Randy Fiser, Ventia Wight, John R Baldwin, Doctor Ritz, A Marida, Lyba, Christa, Williams, Landria Dennis, J Preda, III, Jacobs, Dethrow, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 1:2018cv00893 |
| February 1, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court grants the defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. no. 203] and directs the Clerk to enter judgment as follows: Judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 10/19/2023. Mailed notice. (mma, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/7/2018: Defendant Predo, III is held in default for his failure to file a response to the complaint in compliance with the Court's October 10, 2018 Order. The Court denies Defendant Baldwin's motion to dismiss 42 for the reasons stated. Baldwin is directed to answer the complaint by November 28 2018. Plaintiff's "motion to respond" 50 is terminated as a pending motion. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
