Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Spencer Martin v. Matthew Blair, et al
as 24-2408
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH DETHROW and MATTHEW BLAIR
Spencer Martin v. Matthew Blair, et al
as 24-2384
Defendant:
JOSEPH DETHROW and MATTHEW BLAIR
Plaintiff:
SPENCER MARTIN
Dethrow v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65614
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd., Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Dethrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dethrow v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
James Dethrow
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2022md03025
In Re:
In Re: Proctor & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Erik Velasques, Frank Ortega, Matthew Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dethrow v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 3:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
James Dethrow
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company and Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enge v. Dethrow et al
as 1:2019cv06151
Defendant:
Lilly Diaz, Joseph Dethrow, Hany Shalabi and others
Plaintiff:
Choice Enge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dethrow et al
as 1:2019cv03684
Defendant:
Lt Dethrow, CTO Leeper, G Caro and others
Plaintiff:
Deondre Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv05772
Defendant:
Lt. Jacobs, Sgt. Dethrow, Lt. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleh v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv01812
Plaintiff:
Abdel Jaber Saleh
Defendant:
Randy Pfister and Joey Dethrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
