Dethrow v. Procter & Gamble Company
Plaintiff: James Dethrow
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Case Number: 2:2022cv01997
Filed: April 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTATION ORDER finding as moot #15 Motion for Protective Order. By Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/20/2022. (agm)
May 17, 2022 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order with EXHIBIT A - Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound by Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. Associated Cases: 2:22-md-03025-MHW-CMV et al. (Soukup, Andrew)
April 20, 2022 Filing 14 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Southern; Case Number 3:21-cv-01723. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
April 20, 2022 Judge Michael H. Watson and Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura added. (er)
April 19, 2022 Filing 13 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO - 1) TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to Southern District of Ohio and MDL No. 3025 In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. (kek) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER STAYING CASE: The Parties' Joint Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination (Doc. #10 ) is GRANTED. Proceedings are stayed pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's decision in In re Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 3025. The Parties are DIRECTED to file a Status Report within 14 days of the Panel's decision. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 1/12/2022. (smo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 12, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #10 Motion to Stay filed by Procter & Gamble Company. When pleadings contain multiple attorney signatures, the non-filing attorney must include the language "with consent" with his/her signature. See Section 2.1 of the CM/ECF Users Manual. This notice is for informational purposes and therefore no action is required. (kls3)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 11, 2022 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination by Procter & Gamble Company. (Kelly, Kevin) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 11, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by Procter & Gamble Company of Courtesy Copy of Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407 Filed with Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Kelly, Kevin) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 11, 2022 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Procter & Gamble Company. (Kelly, Kevin) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
January 11, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin D. Kelly on behalf of Procter & Gamble Company (Kelly, Kevin) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 22, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Dethrow. Procter & Gamble Company waiver sent on 12/21/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Geske, Paul) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 21, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Procter & Gamble Company; returned to Attorney Geske for service. (kls3) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 21, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING FILING: The Summons attached at Doc. 1 is a fillable document. Fillable documents should be converted to non-fillable PDF documents before filing on CM/ECF. This Notice is sent for informational purposes only. (kls3)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 21, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Staci M. Yandle assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-1723-SMY. (kls3) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 20, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Geske on behalf of James Dethrow (Geske, Paul) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]
December 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Procter & Gamble Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-4661922.), filed by James Dethrow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Geske, Paul) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 4/20/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dethrow v. Procter & Gamble Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Dethrow
Represented By: Paul T. Geske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Represented By: Kevin D. Kelly
Represented By: Amy S. Heath
Represented By: Andrew Soukup
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?